DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
HCG
Docket No. NR6739-14
15 Jan 15
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
14 January 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by NSSC ltr 4050 Ser N42/153 dated 15
December 2014, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish
the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this
connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
within one year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is
evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its
decision in your case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. NR6739-14
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NETLL
Executive Director
Enclosure: NSSC ltr 4050 Ser N42/153 dtd 15 Dec 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6186 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NSSC ltr 4050 Ser N42/144 dated 15 December 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR6186-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7915 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7187 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2015. Documentary material _considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR7187-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR058 15
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NKOO58-15 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8349 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR8349-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6611 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable - statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR6611-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6435 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on “210 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR6435-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5102 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NSSC ltr 4050 Ser N42/135 dtd' 20 Oct 14, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3493 14
After careful and conscientious consi eration of the the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient establish the existence of probable material error or inj i this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3493-14 Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an otiicial naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6828 14
A three-member: panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR6828-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of.